Posts

Showing posts from February, 2025

Media Paper 2 mock exam - Learner response

1) Type up your feedback in full (you do not need to write mark/grade if you do not wish to). WWW: Q3 is strong and you make good points elsewhere too.  EBI: revise TV regulation industries and magazine Csps.  2) Did you succeed in meeting or exceeding your target grade for A Level Media in this paper? If not, how many additional marks do you need to achieve your target grade in Paper 2? 16 marks  Now read through the real AQA mark scheme for Paper 2.  3) Write a question-by-question analysis of your performance. For each question, write how many marks you got from the number available and identify any points that you missed by carefully studying the AQA indicative content in the mark scheme: Question 1:  the construction of masculinity can be read as paradoxical, with aspects of vulnerability (the pleading look, body language, nakedness) combined with traditional strength the minimal style of the cover – in contrast to other magazines – places it as an alternat...

Media Paper 1 mock exam - Learner response

1) Type up any feedback in full (you do not need to write mark/grade if you do not wish to). WWW: Rubana, Fairly strong response for the stereotypes of youth Q on Ghost Town CSP Q. Your Q7 response is clear and approaches the focus of the Q well.  EBI: Ensure you link genre to your analysis of the unseen Q1. Your approach to Q4 (Hall's) Theory Q - does not fully address the Q. Revise textual Poaching.  Now read through the genuine AQA mark scheme. This is vital as the paper was an official exam paper and therefore the mark scheme tells us a lot about what AQA are expecting us to produce. 2) Write a question-by-question analysis of your performance. For each question, write how many marks you got from the number available and identify any points that you missed by carefully studying the AQA indicative content in the mark scheme: Additional points: didn't mention enough about genre theory e.g. Neale repetition and difference. Could have added more about use of Daniel Craig (st...